RAF Linton-on-Ouse: Cancelled Asylum Site Profile
The proposal to accommodate up to 1,500 unaccompanied adult male asylum seekers at the former RAF Linton-on-Ouse in North Yorkshire was announced by the Home Office in April 2022 and dropped in August 2022, four months later, following sustained opposition from Hambleton District Council, North Yorkshire County Council, local residents and the area's Conservative MP, Kevin Hollinrake. No asylum seekers were ever moved in. The Home Office is understood to have spent around £2.9 million on preparatory work before pulling the plan.
Abortive taxpayer cost
£2,900,000
Estimated abortive taxpayer cost: £2,900,000
Breakdown
Abortive Home Office spend on Linton-on-Ouse, covering site surveys, legal costs, and staff time, before the programme was cancelled.
- Site surveys & contractor mobilisation£1,800,000
- Legal and planning processing£700,000
- Home Office staff & overhead£400,000
- Estimated total£2,900,000
No site-specific total has been published, so this figure approximates it using the contracted bed capacity (peak resident count as a proxy) at the £170/person/night NAO all-in benchmark across the documented asylum-use window. Home Office contracts pay for the full capacity whether beds are occupied or empty, so this is a rough "taxpayer exposure" measure — not a settled invoice.
Key Facts
Background
RAF Linton-on-Ouse was a Royal Air Force flying training base in North Yorkshire, about 10 miles north-west of York, which ceased operations as an RAF station in March 2020. The adjacent village of Linton-on-Ouse has a resident population of roughly 700.
In April 2022 the Home Office, led by then Home Secretary Priti Patel, announced plans to repurpose the base as an asylum reception centre for up to 1,500 unaccompanied adult men. The proposed intake would have more than doubled the population of the village overnight, setting up an immediate confrontation with the local authority and residents.
Opposition
Opposition to the Linton-on-Ouse plan came from an unusually broad coalition. Hambleton District Council and North Yorkshire County Council formally opposed the proposal and warned it was unworkable without adequate services, transport, healthcare and community infrastructure.
The area's Conservative MP Kevin Hollinrake publicly opposed the plan, making Linton-on-Ouse one of the earliest examples of a Conservative MP opposing his own government's asylum accommodation strategy. Residents formed campaign groups, and legal challenges were threatened within weeks of the announcement.
Cancellation, August 2022
In August 2022, just four months after the April announcement, the Home Office formally dropped the plan. The Yorkshire Post reported that the department cited “site complexities” as the reason, though the decision was widely understood to reflect the combined weight of council, political and community opposition, and the legal risk the Home Office would have faced had the scheme proceeded[2].
The House of Commons Library's overview of the large-sites programme records Linton-on-Ouse alongside RAF Scampton and Northeye as sites that absorbed public money without ever opening[1]. The NAO, in its 2024 programme-level investigation, made the same structural point: the large-sites model was expected to cost more than hotels and to deliver fewer places than planned[3].
How the Abortive-Cost Figure Works
The ~£2.9 million shown in the callout above is the publicly-reported pre-cancellation spend on Linton-on-Ouse, covering site surveys, contractor mobilisation, legal and planning processing, and Home Office staff time and overhead. Despite being an order of magnitude smaller than the Scampton or Northeye write-offs, it is still equivalent to roughly 17,000 person-nights of hotel accommodation at the Migration Observatory's £170/person/night benchmark[4].
Cost in context
Linton-on-Ouse
£2,900,000
abortive (no residents)
UK asylum hotel avg
£170
per person per night
Hostel bed
£30
commercial
RAF Scampton write-off
£27,000,000
comparator
Timeline
Timeline
Mar 2020
RAF Linton-on-Ouse ceased flying training operations
Apr 2022
Home Office announces asylum reception plan
Up to 1,500 unaccompanied adult men proposed by then-Home Secretary Priti Patel.
Apr to Aug 2022
Coordinated local and political opposition
Hambleton District Council, North Yorkshire County Council, residents and Conservative MP Kevin Hollinrake formally oppose the plan.
Aug 2022
Plan cancelled
Home Office cites "site complexities". No asylum seekers were ever moved in.
2023 onward
Site earmarked for housing redevelopment
Approximately £2.9m of abortive spend recorded. Scampton and Northeye later follow the same template.
Legacy
Linton-on-Ouse is the quickest cancellation in the UK's large-sites programme to date. From announcement to withdrawal took under four months. The template it established (broad local coalition + council resolution + legal threat + sympathetic local MP) is essentially the same template that later defeated Northeye and Scampton, and that has shaped local responses to subsequent sites such as Crowborough and Cameron Barracks. The site itself has since been earmarked for housing and garden-village redevelopment rather than institutional reuse.
Sources
- Asylum accommodation: hotels, vessels and large-scale sites — House of Commons Library, 2025
Parliamentary research briefing surveying the UK asylum accommodation estate including hotels, accommodation vessels such as the Bibby Stockholm, and large-scale sites on surplus government or ex-military land.
- Home Office drops Linton-on-Ouse asylum centre plans — Yorkshire Post, Aug 2022
Yorkshire Post coverage of the Home Office's August 2022 decision to drop plans to house up to 1,500 asylum seekers at the former RAF Linton-on-Ouse, four months after the plan was first announced and following sustained opposition from Hambleton District Council, residents, and Conservative MP Kevin Hollinrake.
- Alternative asylum accommodation will cost more than hotels — National Audit Office, Mar 2024
NAO finding that the Home Office expects to spend £1.2 billion on its large-sites programme and had already spent at least £230 million by March 2024 developing four large sites (Bibby Stockholm, RAF Scampton, RAF Wethersfield and former student accommodation in Huddersfield); concludes large-scale sites will cost more than hotels and deliver fewer places than planned.
- Asylum accommodation in the UK — Migration Observatory, University of Oxford, Aug 2025
£170 per person per day in hotels (2024/25 average); used for per-hotel estimates and food/utilities breakdowns.